Anatoly fomenko new chronology biblical

A long thread I started on the RevisedHistory forum; very strange that a text search of his works does not return even one instance of his famous pupil Alexander the Great; his "Politics" sounds fairly modern, perhaps a few hundred years old; forum member Ron finds similarities between Aristotle and Arab scholar Averroes The Supposedly Flawless Memories of Homer's Disciples and the horse in the Trojan "Horse" story is probably a bad translation or interpretation of "like a horse.

Fomenko writes, "The nursery tale about a gigantic hollow equine statue is just as preposterous as the Scaligerian tale of Homer's seven hundred pages melodiously sung aloud by the "ancient" Greek shepherds for five hundred years before they could be written down, five hundred years after the fall of Troy. At the very least, the similar repeating short names added another dimension of complexity for historians throughout the ages.

And the full names of emperors Caligula or Nero don't even contain the words "caligula" or "nero. There should be no such difference between the two! Hence, year according to the Chinese calendar should be interpreted as monthi. Therefore, we arrive at yearwhich was the time when the Chinese "civilization" began its independent from the Empire development!!!

It explains why the "first" people had lifespans of, and "years". Divided by 12, in order to convert those units from lunar to annual, we get the usual ages of 75, 42, and 25 years respectively. These stems were used to denote a certain period of time, but the precise meaning is unknown because the words have received different connotations in different languages.

Therefore, some unreasonable ages must have been calculated in units other than years, e. Why was Martin Luther not set on fire? ALSO, the post shows the English Hexapla Parallel New Testament, which has 6 different English translations, and shows how different the translations are from each other using just the first page of the NT I am still clueless about Christianity's origins, plus my take on Apocalyptic cults.

I'm still at a loss at understanding why Christianity started, when the Catholic Church formed, who Jesus was if he even existed, and the place of the "Gospels" or any work of "scripture". He also believes that the Apocalypse mentioned in Revelation was for a time period give or take a few years aroundand that Jesus may be buried in Istanbul at a site currently believed to be the grave of Saint?

Fomenko's historical not astronomical reasons for dating the Book of Revelations to year A. So, I think Fomenko is saying that year A. My take on apocalyptic cults: "Have you ever read about apocalyptic cults? So, I imagine that those cults are first formed by mostly middle-aged or elderly people who realize that parts of life sucks for some reason or other, so uh, God's gonna off almost everyone and create a New Age of Enlightenment after getting ridding of the sucky parts of his blessed Creation.

And when the Apocalypse doesn't come, these idiots extend the timeline by one or more generations, until followers lose complete interest in the bullshit or the date of the Apocalypse is post-poned to some way distant future or its agreed that The End will Come only When God decides. Fomenko believes that Moses successor Joshua was equivalent to Alexander the Great.

Anatoly fomenko new chronology biblical

Joshua is considered the most warlike in the Bible, with military campaign after military campaign; two of the kings Joshua conquered were Makkedah and Madon. Fomenko thinks Alexander of Macedon really lived during 15th or 16th centuries A. The outline details mostly seem to say "both were very warlike, and conquered many lands and nations. This post also refers to the "Analyzing Old Maps" post.

I wrote, " the A. On the map, you'll notice that practically the entire Eastern Hemisphere has regions labeled with some derivation of "India. So, Fomenko has the continuously warlike Joshua sucessor of Moses equal not only the continuously warlike Alexander the Great, but equal the continuously warlike Charlesmagne as well. But, the only volcanoes around are in Italy, not Palestine.

And the most famous eruption was in Italy of Mt. Vesuvius, which destroyed Pompeii, according to mainstream history in 79 A. Discussion of this is in Chronology 1pages Altman writes:"One of the best-kept secrets of the Dead Sea Scrolls has been the discovery of metals in the black ink. That finding was buried in unpublished results, and wasn't unearthed until The presence of metals further points to the scrolls being of medieval origin.

Scholars tried to downplay the discovery of these metals by saying that some of them, like copper and lead, were byproducts of leaching from a bronze inkwell. Yet silver, manganese and iron are not components in the making of bronze. The s tests also detected the presence of strontium and titanium but could not tell if they were pure.

In its purest form, neither element was isolated until the s. Scholars tell us that ink spiked with metals came after the writing of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The new chronology is a pseudohistorical theory proposed by Anatoly Fomenko who argues that events of antiquity generally attributed to the ancient civilizations of RomeGreece and Egypt actually occurred during the Middle Agesmore than a thousand years later.

The theory further proposes that world history prior to AD has been widely falsified to suit the interests of a number of different conspirators including the Vaticanthe Holy Roman Empireand the Russian House of Romanovall working to obscure the "true" history of the world centered around a global empire called the "Russian Horde". Reception from mainstream scholars has been universally negative, and the ideas were first widely disseminated in the s by Russian chess master Garry Kasparov.

The concepts that constitute the new chronology has its origins in the work of Russian scholar Nikolai Morozov —[ 1 ] although the earlier work of the French scholar Jean Hardouin — can be seen as an intellectual progenitor. The theory is most fully explained in History: Fiction or Science? The new chronology features a totally reconstructed timeline, portraying a history that is radically shorter than what is universally accepted, based on a thesis that in effect compresses all of recorded history from the Neolithic to the Early Middle Ages into a period less than a millennium long.

According to Fomenko's claims, the practice of written history only emerged c. The new chronology is universally rejected by the scientific and historiographical communities, being totally inconsistent with the accepted methodology used in the relevant fields, including absolute and relative dating techniques. It is considered to be pseudoarchaeologicalpseudohistoricaland pseudoscientific.

The theory emerged alongside numerous other pseudohistorical and conspiracy-minded literature in a period of heightened nationalism and more lax restrictions on freedom of press following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The idea of chronologies that differ from the conventional chronology can be traced back to at least the second half of the 17th century.

Jean Hardouin then suggested that many ancient historical documents were much younger than commonly believed to be. In he published a version of Pliny the Elder 's Natural History in which he claimed that most Greek and Roman texts had been forged by Benedictine monks. When later questioned on these results, Hardouin stated that he would reveal the monks' reasons in a letter to be revealed only after his death.

The executors of his estate were unable to find anatoly fomenko new chronology biblical a document among his posthumous papers. InEdwin Johnson expressed the opinion that early Christian history was largely invented or corrupted in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. In Otto Rank made note of duplications in literary history of a variety of cultures:.

Especially the history of their birth and of their early years is furnished with phantastic traits; the amazing similarity, nay literal identity, of those tales, even if they refer to different, completely independent peoples, sometimes geographically far removed from one another, is well known and has struck many an investigator. Fomenko became interested in Morozov's theories in Intogether with a few colleagues from the mathematics department of Moscow State Universityhe published several articles on "new mathematical methods in history" in peer-reviewed journals.

By the early s, Fomenko shifted his focus from trying to convince the scientific community via peer-reviewed publications to publishing books. Alex Beam writes that Fomenko and his colleagues were discovered by the Soviet scientific press in the early s, leading to "a brief period of renown"; a contemporary review from the Soviet journal Questions of History complained, "Their constructions have nothing in common with Marxist historical science.

Central to Fomenko's new chronology is his claim of the existence of a vast Slav-Turk empire, called the "Russian Horde", which played a dominant role in Eurasian history before the 17th century. The various peoples identified in ancient and medieval history, from the ScythiansHunsGoths and Bulgarsthrough the PolansDulebesDrevlians and Pechenegsto in more recent times, the CossacksUkrainiansand Belarusiansare nothing but elements of the single Russian Horde.

Fomenko claims that the most probable prototype of the historical Jesus was Andronikos I Komnenos allegedly AD tothe emperor of Byzantium, known for his failed reforms, his traits and deeds reflected in 'biographies' of many real and imaginary persons. Fomenko claims the Hagia Sophia is actually the biblical Temple of Solomon. He identifies Solomon as sultan Suleiman the Magnificent — However, according to Fomenko the word "Rome" is a placeholder and can signify any one of several different cities and kingdoms.

He claims: the "First Rome" or "Ancient Rome" or "Mizraim" is an ancient Egyptian kingdom in the delta of the Nile with its capital in Alexandriathat the second and most famous "New Rome" is Constantinople, and that the third "Rome" is constituted by three different cities: Constantinople againRome in Italy, and Moscow. Fomenko examines astronomical events described in ancient texts and claims that the chronology is actually medieval.

For example:. Fomenko's historical ideas have been universally rejected by mainstream scientistshistoriansand scholars, who brand them as pseudohistorypseudoarchaeologyand pseudoscience[ 27 ] but were popularized by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov. Kasparov also felt it illogical that the Romans and the Greeks living under the banner of Byzantium could fail to use the mounds of scientific knowledge left to them by Ancient Greece and Rome, especially when it was of urgent military use.

Kasparov does not support the reconstruction part of the new chronology. According to Sheiko, "Fomenko and his allies are unrepentant, noting that the Mongolian, Turkic, and Ukrainian peoples are sadly mistaken in the delusion that they were ever anything other than elements of the Russian Horde", and remarks that for Russian critics, Fomenko represents both an embarrassment and a potent symbol of the depths to which the Russian academy and society have generally sunk amid the diverse societal misfortunes heaped upon Russia since the fall of Communism.

In at the Moscow International Book Fair, Anatoly Fomenko with his coauthor Gleb Nosovsky were awarded for their books on "new chronology" the anti-prize called "Abzatz" literally 'paragraph', a Russian slang word meaning 'disaster' or 'fiasco' in the category "Pochotnaya bezgramota" the term is a pun upon "Pochotnaya gramota" Certificate of Honor and may be translated as either "Certificate of Dishonor" or literally, "Respectable Illiteracy" for the worst book published in Russia.

Critics have accused Fomenko of altering the data to improve the fit with his ideas and have noted that he violates a key rule of statistics by selecting matches from the historical record which support his chronology, while ignoring those which do not, creating artificial, better-than-chance correlations, and that these practices undermine Fomenko's statistical arguments.

James Billingtonformerly professor of Russian history at Harvard and Princeton and the Librarian of Congress from to placed Fomenko's work within the context of the political movement of Eurasianismwhich sought to tie Russian history closely to that of its Asian neighbors. Billington describes Fomenko as ascribing the belief in past hostility between Russia and the Mongols to the influence of Western historians.

Thus, by Fomenko's chronology, "Russia and Turkey are parts of a previously single empire. It is surprising, to say the least, that a well-known Dutch publisher could produce an expensive book of such doubtful intellectual value, of which the only good word that can be said is that it contains an enormous amount of factual historical material, untidily ordered, true; badly written, yes; mixed-up with conjectural nonsense, sure; but still, much useful stuff.

For the rest of the book is absolutely worthless. It reminds one of the early Soviet attempts to produce tendentious science Lysenko! In brief: a useless and misleading book. In Septembermajor Russian politician and academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Sergey Glazyev publicly proposed Fomenko's New Chronology as a "reliable support for the formation of modern ideology that consolidates Russian society":.

Chronology 1. Mathematical-statistical methods of dating. Global chronological map. Identifications of ancient and medieval dynasties. Main shifts in the chronology. Reflection of the evangelic events of the XII century A. In two books. Chronology 2. Kalashnikov, G. Astronomical methods in chronology. Ptolemy's Almagest. Tycho Brahe. Egyptian zodiacs ".

First part of the third volume of "Chronology". Fomenko, Tatiana N. Fomenko, Vladimir V. Kalashnikov, Gleb V. Chronology 3. Second part of the third volume of "Chronology". Rome ". In three books. Fomenko, Gleb V. Chronology 4. Great conquest. The Etruscans. Scandinavia ". Universal medieval Horde-Atamanian Empire. Conquest of the land of the Covenant.

Calendar and the Easter ". In four books. Reconstruction of the anatoly fomenko new chronology biblical history. The Khans of Novgorod — The Habsburgs. A legacy of the Great Empire in the history and culture of Eurasia and America ". In A. Fomenko prepared a new edition of the seven-volume book "Chronology". This edition differs significantly from the previous ones.

Series "Fiction or science". Astronomical dating of the monuments of Ancient Egypt. Studies of years". Research of years". In a significantly revised form this book was issued under the name "Cossack-arias: from Russia to India". See the next point. Battle of Kulikovo in the Mahabharata. Volos book. New dating of zodiacs. Ptolemy and Ortely within new chronology ".

Petersburg, publishing house "Neva", After Christ. The Trojan war. Foundation of Rome ". Datings of ". Heathendom and Christianity. Christianization of the Empire. Konstantin the Great — Dmitry Donskoy. Battle of Kulikovo in Bible. Sergius of Radonezh — the creator of fire arms. Dating of carpet from Baye ". Istanbul in the light of new chronology ".

New data about Andronicus-Christ. King Arthur is a reflection of Christ and Dmitry Donskoy ". The Scaligerian chronology is wrong. This is the idea that embraces this book, and the message that contains its title. This work opens the door to the doubt of the veracity of history, gives it a meaning and it points to an unquestionable monumental manipulation.

It is based on the temporal compression of the chronological map produced by the scientific research project known as the New Chronology, led by Russian mathematicians Anatoly T. Fomenko and Gleb V. But it introduces a variant, called X timeline, that complements it.